Transit Oriented Development


EOI: 10.11242/viva-tech.01.05.241

Download Full Text here



Citation

Ms. Bhushan Rahate, Ms. Saurabh Shirke, Ms. Prachi Sonawane, Shruti Tambe, "Transit Oriented Development", VIVA-IJRI Volume 1, Issue 5, Article 1, pp. 1-5, 2022. Published by Computer Engineering Department, VIVA Institute of Technology, Virar, India.

Abstract

Transit oriented development (TOD) is an effective urban planning technique that addresses the present-day concerns of sustainability. It relies on integrating land use and transport network systems. It is the concept with utmost effective solution for accommodating a better and controlled urban growth. Although, National TOD policy is already been published by the Indian Government and it has envisaged a substantial optimistic influence in eradicating problems. India is one of the fastest growing economies of the world and is also the second most populous nation, furthermore it has a rapidly growing urban population owing to which the cities are facing severe problems and challenges related to mobility, congestion and subsequently pollution. Even though, a diversity of criteria and indicators are listed by various authors that impacts the use of TOD techniques. Nonetheless, every country has its own challenges and problems for applicability and effective implementation of TOD. This paper attempts to identify those challenges pertaining to adoption and implementation at the urban body level. The study mainly adopts primary means of data collection. It reviews policies and case studies and captures the stakeholder's perception on the identified concerns from the secondary study.

Keywords

Transit, Amendment, buzzword, motorization,

References

  1. Transit oriented development in the united state: Experience, challenges and prospect, Robert cervero, Transport Research Board.
  2. From Transit adjacent to transit-oriented development, John L Rane, Local Environmental14 (1), 1-15, 2009.
  3. Reason for living in a transit oriented development and associated transit use Hollie Lund, Journal of the American planning Associated 72(3), 3357-366,2006..
  4. Dena Belzer, Gerald Autler Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy, 2002
  5. Hollie M Lund, Robert Cervero, Richard Willson Sacramento, CA: California Department of Transportation, 2004 Michael Duncan, Urban studies 48 (1), 101-127, 2011.R
  6. Robert Cervero, Jennifer Day Transport policy 15 (5), 315-323, 2008.
  7. Anna Ibraeva, Gonçalo Homem de Almeida Correia, Cecília Silva, António Pais Antunes Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 132, 110-130, 2020.
  8. Joe Holmes, James van Hemert The Rocky Mountain Land Use Institute, 2008.
  9. Marc Schlossberg, Nathaniel Brown.
  10. Transportation research record 1887 (1), 34-42, 2004.
  11. Ian Carlton Working Paper, 2009.
  12. Richard D Knowles Journal of transport geography 22, 251-261, 2012.
  13. Ming Zhang Transportation Research Record 2038 (1), 120-127, 2007.
  14. Todd Messenger, Reid Ewing Transportation Research Record 1552 (1), 145-153, 1996
  15. ShreyaGupta1, JayanthIvvala, H.S.Grewal, “Development of natural wax based durable superhydrophobic coatings” Industrial Crops and Products Volume 171, 1 November 2021, 113871